<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ai Code on remixware.com</title>
    <link>https://remixware.com/tags/ai-code/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ai Code on remixware.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://remixware.com/tags/ai-code/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Checking AI-Written Code for Open Source It Reproduced</title>
      <link>https://remixware.com/checking-ai-written-code-for-open-source-it-reproduced/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://remixware.com/checking-ai-written-code-for-open-source-it-reproduced/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI coding assistants write a lot of code now, and most of it is new: glue between your own functions and small helpers built for the problem in front of them. Now and then, though, an assistant writes something it has seen many times before. A well-known function from a popular library comes out nearly word for word, sometimes with the names changed to fit your code.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That copy can carry the licence of the code it came from. If the original was MIT, you owe its authors a copyright line in your notices. If it was GPL, the copy may not belong in a closed product at all. The assistant doesn&amp;rsquo;t tell you which happened, and code review rarely catches it, because the code looks fine and does what it should.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
